Skip to content

2017 vs. 2020 NEC: 10 Exam Questions Where the Answer Changes (2026)

2017 NEC trap questions: answers that change if you studied the 2020 NEC - JCR Productions

These 10 exam questions show where the 2017 vs. 2020 NEC answers split, and on a 2017 NEC exam only the 2017 answer scores. Tennessee, Nevada, Arizona and Kansas still grade on the 2017 edition (see the full list of 2017 NEC exam states), where GFCI covers only unfinished basements and 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles, there is no 210.8(F), no 230.67 surge rule and no 230.85 emergency disconnect, and six service disconnects can share one enclosure. Section numbers differ too. Work the 10 questions below with your 2017 book open. Want the whole list of edits rather than a quiz? Read 2020 NEC changes vs. 2017. Prefer straight practice first? Try these five 2017 NEC practice questions with answers.

Testing in Tennessee, Nevada, Arizona or Kansas? Those exams score the 2017 answer, not the 2020 one. JCR's state 2017 NEC packages train you on the edition you'll be graded on.

What you get for $495: a 152-page printed 2017 NEC study manual, 100 video lessons (21 hours), a digital mock with 300+ questions including a full 100-question timed exam, a printed mock exam booklet and permanent code tabs.

Tennessee: $495 Nevada C-2: $495 Arizona: $495 Kansas: $495

Not ready to buy? Take the free 25-question 2017 NEC mock first.

2017 vs. 2020 NEC: the rules that flip exam answers

Topic 2017 NEC (scored) 2020 NEC habit
Dwelling GFCI voltage 210.8(A): 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles only 125- through 250-volt receptacles
Basements 210.8(A)(5): unfinished portions only 210.8(A)(5): all basements
Outdoor outlets No 210.8(F) 210.8(F): dwelling outdoor outlets
Service disconnects 230.71(A): up to six, single enclosure allowed 230.71(B): separate enclosures or compartments
Dwelling surge protection No service requirement 230.67
Outdoor emergency disconnect No requirement 230.85
Dwelling 83% rule 310.15(B)(7) 310.12
Ampacity table Table 310.15(B)(16) Table 310.16
Ambient correction Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) Table 310.15(B)(1)
More than 3 conductors Table 310.15(B)(3)(a) Table 310.15(C)(1)
8 ft rod in soil 250.53(G) 250.53(A)(4)

Worked example: same answer, different section

A 200 A, 120/240-volt service supplies a one-family dwelling. Under 2017 310.15(B)(7), the conductors need 83% of 200 A: 200 × 0.83 = 166 A. In the 75°C column of Table 310.15(B)(16), 1/0 copper is 150 A (too small) and 2/0 copper is 175 A, so 2/0 Cu. Aluminum 3/0 is 155 A (too small) and 4/0 is 180 A, so 4/0 Al.

The 2020 NEC gives the same wire, but from 310.12 and Table 310.16. If the answer choices pair the size with a section number, only the 2017 numbers are right on your exam.

Exam traps to unlearn

  • Reading 250 volts into 210.8(A). A 2017 GFCI question about a dryer, range or 240-volt receptacle almost always ends at 125 V, 15 and 20 A.
  • Answering from the new sections. 210.8(F), 230.67 and 230.85 don't exist in the 2017 book. If you can't find a section in your 2017 NEC, it isn't the answer.
  • Tabbing the 2020 numbers. Label your tabs with Table 310.15(B)(16), (B)(2)(a) and (B)(3)(a).

10 2017 NEC practice questions with a 2020 trap

Each question has one 2017 answer and one tempting 2020 answer. Write yours down, then open the explanation.

Question 1

A 125-volt, 15-amp receptacle is installed in a finished basement family room of a dwelling, not near a sink. What protection does the 2017 NEC require?

  1. GFCI only
  2. AFCI only
  3. Both GFCI and AFCI
  4. Neither

Question 2

A 30-amp, 125/250-volt dryer receptacle is installed in a dwelling laundry room, 4 ft from a laundry sink. Is GFCI protection required by 2017 210.8(A)?

  1. No, 210.8(A) covers only 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles
  2. Yes, laundry areas, 210.8(A)(10)
  3. Yes, within 6 ft of a sink, 210.8(A)(7)
  4. Yes, but only on a 4-wire circuit

Question 3

A hardwired 240-volt, 30-amp outlet supplies an air-conditioning condenser outdoors at a one-family dwelling. Does the 2017 NEC require GFCI protection for it?

  1. No, the 2017 outdoor rule, 210.8(A)(3), covers 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles
  2. Yes, outdoor outlets, 210.8(F)
  3. Yes, 210.8(A)(3) covers all outdoor outlets
  4. Yes, if it is within 25 ft of the meter

Question 4

What is the minimum copper conductor for a 200 A, 120/240-volt single-phase dwelling service using the 83% rule, and which 2017 section allows it?

  1. 2/0 Cu, 310.15(B)(7)
  2. 2/0 Cu, 310.12
  3. 3/0 Cu, Table 310.15(B)(16)
  4. 4/0 Cu, 310.15(B)(7)

Question 5

How much of a rod electrode must be in contact with the soil, and where is that rule in the 2017 NEC?

  1. 8 ft, 250.53(A)(4)
  2. 8 ft, 250.53(G)
  3. 10 ft, 250.53(G)
  4. 6 ft, 250.52(A)(5)

Question 6

What is the ampacity of #3 THWN copper, three current-carrying conductors in a raceway, 30°C ambient, and which 2017 table gives it?

  1. 100 A, Table 310.16
  2. 100 A, Table 310.15(B)(16)
  3. 85 A, Table 310.15(B)(16)
  4. 75 A, Table 310.15(B)(16)

Question 7

Four current-carrying #6 THW copper conductors run in one raceway at 120°F ambient. What is the adjusted ampacity, and which 2017 tables supply the factors?

  1. 39 A, Tables 310.15(B)(2)(a) and 310.15(B)(3)(a)
  2. 39 A, Tables 310.15(B)(1) and 310.15(C)(1)
  3. 48.8 A, Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) only
  4. 52 A, Table 310.15(B)(3)(a) only

Question 8

Under the 2017 NEC, may a service have six circuit breakers as its service disconnecting means, all mounted in a single enclosure?

  1. Yes, 230.71(A) allows up to six in a single enclosure
  2. No, each must be in a separate enclosure or compartment
  3. No, a dwelling service is limited to one disconnect
  4. Yes, but only up to two

Question 9

A new 200 A service is installed for a one-family dwelling. What surge protection does Article 230 of the 2017 NEC require at the service?

  1. None
  2. A Type 1 or Type 2 SPD
  3. A Type 3 SPD at the meter
  4. An SPD only if the service is overhead

Question 10

A one-family dwelling has its meter outside and its main breaker inside, at the nearest point of entrance of the service conductors. Does the 2017 NEC require an additional outdoor emergency disconnect?

  1. No, 230.70(A)(1) allows the disconnect inside, nearest the point of entrance
  2. Yes, 230.85
  3. Yes, every dwelling disconnect must be outdoors
  4. Only if the meter is more than 10 ft from the panel

Answer key: 2017 vs. 2020 sections

Show the answer to question 1Hide the answer to question 1

1. B, AFCI only (2017 210.8(A)(5), 210.12(A))

2017 210.8(A)(5) requires GFCI only in unfinished portions of basements, and a family room is on the 210.12(A) AFCI list. 2020 210.8(A)(5) covers all basements, which is why a 2020-trained candidate picks C.

Show the answer to question 2Hide the answer to question 2

2. A, not required (2017 210.8(A))

In 2017, 210.8(A) applies to 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles, so neither (A)(7) nor (A)(10) reaches a 30-amp dryer receptacle. 2020 210.8(A) covers 125- through 250-volt receptacles without the 15- and 20-amp limit, so a 2020-trained candidate picks B or C.

Show the answer to question 3Hide the answer to question 3

3. A, not required (2017 210.8(A)(3))

The 2017 edition has no 210.8(F). Its outdoor rule, 210.8(A)(3), is limited to 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles. 2020 added 210.8(F) for dwelling outdoor outlets, the trap in B.

Show the answer to question 4Hide the answer to question 4

4. A, 2/0 Cu (2017 310.15(B)(7))

200 × 0.83 = 166 A. 2/0 Cu is 175 A at 75°C in Table 310.15(B)(16). The size is the same in 2020, but the 83% rule moved to 310.12, so B has the right wire and the wrong section.

Show the answer to question 5Hide the answer to question 5

5. B, 8 ft (2017 250.53(G))

2017 250.53(G) requires at least 8 ft of the rod in contact with the soil. The 2020 NEC moved it to 250.53(A)(4), choice A.

Show the answer to question 6Hide the answer to question 6

6. B, 100 A (2017 Table 310.15(B)(16))

THWN is a 75°C conductor, and #3 Cu is 100 A in that column. 85 A is the 60°C value, the trap for anyone who skips the insulation type, and no column lists 75 A for #3 copper. 2020 renumbered the table to 310.16, choice A.

Show the answer to question 7Hide the answer to question 7

7. A, 39 A (2017 Tables 310.15(B)(2)(a) and 310.15(B)(3)(a))

#6 THW Cu is 65 A at 75°C. At 120°F, the 75°C column of Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) gives 0.75, and 4 to 6 conductors take 80%: 65 × 0.75 × 0.80 = 39 A. Don't read 0.82 from the 90°C column. 2020 numbers those tables 310.15(B)(1) and 310.15(C)(1), choice B.

Show the answer to question 8Hide the answer to question 8

8. A, yes (2017 230.71(A))

2017 230.71(A) allows not more than six switches or sets of circuit breakers, mounted in a single enclosure, in a group of separate enclosures, or in or on a switchboard or switchgear. 2020 230.71(B) requires separate enclosures, panelboards or compartments, the trap in B.

Show the answer to question 9Hide the answer to question 9

9. A, none (2017 Article 230)

The 2017 NEC has no dwelling service surge requirement. The Type 1 or Type 2 SPD in B comes from 2020 230.67.

Show the answer to question 10Hide the answer to question 10

10. A, no (2017 230.70(A)(1))

2017 230.70(A)(1) permits the service disconnect outside or inside nearest the point of entrance of the service conductors. The outdoor emergency disconnect for one- and two-family dwellings is 2020 230.85, choice B.

2017 vs. 2020 NEC trap question FAQ

Which electrical exams still use the 2017 NEC?

Tennessee's LLE and CE through Prov, Nevada's C-2 and Arizona's R-11, C-11 and CR-11 through PSI, and Kansas KGD, KGH and KGX through ICC and Pearson VUE.

Will a 2020 answer be marked right on a 2017 NEC exam?

Only when the rule and section are the same in both editions. Where they differ, the exam scores the 2017 answer, including the 2017 section number.

Does the 2017 NEC require GFCI for a 240-volt receptacle in a dwelling?

Not under 210.8(A). The 2017 dwelling list covers 125-volt, 15- and 20-amp receptacles. The 2020 edition expanded it to 250 volts.

Is the free 2017 NEC mock exam the full 100 questions?

No. The free mock is 25 questions with instant feedback and an NEC reference for every answer. The full 100-question timed mock is in the $495 package.

Do journeyman and master exams test the 2017 vs. 2020 NEC differences?

They test the 2017 rules, so the differences matter. Kansas KGH journeyman and KGD master candidates, and Tennessee, Nevada and Arizona contractor candidates, are scored on the 2017 section numbers and the 2017 GFCI, disconnect and surge rules.

Drill the 2017 answers before exam day

Start with the free 25-question mock, then lock in 2017 numbers with the full package.

Take the free 2017 NEC mock

Pick your state's package: Tennessee, Nevada C-2, Arizona or Kansas ($495 each). Another 2017 NEC exam? See the 2017 NEC self-study package.

Sources

Reviewed November 6, 2026. NEC references are to the 2017 edition.

  • Victor's class is always very informative and enjoyable to attend every year I go.

    Chase Hall
    2 weeks ago
  • Awesome Class Victor is a great instructor

    Tom P
    3 weeks ago
  • Great class. Definitely gave me the confidence to take the exam o,I didn't have before.

    Erin Lacoille
    3 weeks ago
  • It's the perfect method to ace the exam 👍

    Oly Castro
    3 weeks ago
  • Did the CEU 8-hour course with Victor. It was great. He broke down how professionals should address and use the NFPA. Thoroughly enjoyed the knowledge and experiences.

    Seth McCurty
    5 months ago
  • I have been attending JCR Productions now for 30+ years. Victor Ring and Jeff Rodriguez have instructed me from my apprenticeship days to passing my unlimited license exam. They have been a huge part of helping me to gain the knowledge I need to be successful in the electrical field. They make it fun as well. I have recommend JCR Productions for exam prep and CE courses to hundreds of people over the last 30+ years. I would not go anywhere else!

    Sean Ryan
    3 months ago
  • Victor Ring was my instructor and he did an amazing job at being very informative as well as interactive, and his concern for practicing safety was priority #1. Definitely looking forward to learning much more from this group.

    Travis Hall
    4 months ago
  • I have taken the CE classes with JCR for the last 13 years. I hold 15 state master's and 6 contractor's license and I look forward to going every year. Victor Ring is a well-educated and an excellent instructor. I would recommend this program for your CE requirements or your master's exam prep.

    terry blair
    3 months ago
  • I have enjoyed going to Victor's CEU classes since I first started attending them a few years ago. He has a lot of experience and is very knowledgeable on the NEC and in the electrical industry. I plan to do all my CEU's with JCR every year.

    Josh Boling
    6 months ago
  • I have attended JCR classes on several occasions. I used their exam prep and feel very confident in saying it was a large portion of my success. I continue to use JCR classes with Victor Ring for CE credits and have no intention of stopping in the future.

    Michael Griffin
    5 months ago
  • I completed my 8-hour Continuing Education Electrical Code course with JCR Productions and had a great experience. If you need to complete your required hours to maintain your electrical license, this course is an excellent choice. Victor Ring kept the class upbeat, engaging, and easy to follow. He does a great job breaking down the material and showing simpler, more efficient ways to navigate the NEC Code book, which makes the information practical and immediately useful in the field. Highly recommend this course to any electrician looking for a professional, informative, and enjoyable way to get their continuing education hours completed.

    Matt Pressley
    5 months ago
  • The exam prep class was great. Victor is very knowledgeable and takes making sure everyone is ready to take the test personally. Never met anyone that cares about people and how their future. I will defiantly going to taking more classes in the future.

    michael taylor
    6 months ago
  • Always learn something new from every class I have taken from JCR production. Really enjoy the way Mr Ring teaches class. Thank you ! Ken Koehler

    Ken Koehler
    3 months ago
  • Taken multiple JCR classes, specifically with Mr. Victor ring, love his classes. He’s extremely knowledgeable in his field and can present info in a way that’s easy to learn. Will continue using him for all future classes and continuing education credits.

    Brandon Whitley
    9 months ago
  • Victor Ring has a gifted mind for understanding electricity and he shares that information in an impressively articulate manner. He is a great teacher, and I would recommend JCR to any professional electrician who needs to brush up on their skills and learn new methods of installation to serve our customers and ourselves well. Big ups to Vic! -Willis Tisdale Greenville SC

  • I always thoroughly enjoy the seminars with Victor Ring and JCR . Victors knowledge of the material he is teaching and his delivery is superb. Which is matched with his office staff who are very helpful.

    Robert Carignan
    7 months ago
  • Highly Recommend the Exam Preparation class!! Victor is great! I will continue using JCR in the future.

    Corey Hutchens
    6 months ago
  • I recently attended the Exam Prep Class and I was extremely impressed with Mr. Victor's approach to navigating the code book. He took what can be an intimidating book and simplified it in a way anyone could understand. He is without a doubt, the Best teacher I have had the privilege of learning from. I will be using him for my continuing education classes in the future.

    Mitch Grizzard
    5 months ago
  • This was absolutely the best class I have ever attended during my journey in the trade! Victor is awesome and extremely knowledgeable! He truly inspires you through his teaching to become the best you can be! Awesome!

    Ronald whitener
    6 months ago
  • I recently decided to go for my electrical license. Taking the JCR test prep really helped me to better understand navigating the code along with some additional methods for using the code that helped clarify the book. I will continue using JCR for my continuing ed along with other resources. Highly recommend taking this exam prep!

    Micah Barfield
    8 months ago
  • As usual Victor's class was highly enjoyable and energetic. He is a 1st rate instructor, and JCR is the only place I'll go for exam and CE studies.

    Brian Chase
    6 months ago
  • Victor was fantastic . The class was very informative. The study guide from Jeff and Victor were a driving force behind me passing my electrical licensing exam . I can’t thank them enough. They changed my and my family’s life for the better . I wish I could give more than 5 stars . Will only be doing CE with the JCR team .

    Michael Lewis
    6 months ago
  • I have been using JCR Productions for more than a decade and am never disappointed. Victor is bringing some fresh trainings that apply directly to someone that owns their own electrical business.

    Jason Fradenburgh
    6 months ago
  • I have been going to JCR for my North Carolina license continuing education since 2001 and this class has always kept me on top of the code changes and a refresher of all the material in the code book. I have gone to other continuing education classes for licenses in other states and JCR has always been my favorite.

    Tom Francisco
    6 months ago